|
The
duet of Ernesto Rodrigues and Jorge Valente was once named Orquestra Vermelha
(the Portuguese name for Red Orchestra). The reasons for this choice –
let it be remembered that it was thus the espionage network set up by
the Soviet secret services in the III Reich called itself – are
understandable, as well as those making them change their minds. Clearly
orchestral is the approach to electroacoustics made by these two improvisers
who, faithful to the principle that any sound is apt to be put to use
when craeting music, fall into the Cagean tradition. Thanks to the “extension”
of the violin operated by electronics and to the polyphonies concocted
by Quatour, an interactive program on a Max basis fed by a Yamaha DX7
II synthesizer, the sound planes are multiplied, gaining an ambience we
might call symphonic. On the other hand, the symbolic and rather ironic
allusion to the existence of communist “submarines” among
the Nazis is enlightening with regard to the ways of both, since they
infiltrate musical aesthetics and typologies which have little or nothing
in common so as to obtain dividends alien to those areas. I’m speaking
about post-serialism and free jazz of which they consider themselves to
be followers by crosslinking elements with no apparent affinity. From
this geometrical progression there are results what is normally called
“stochastic music”, a name which does define though it does
not label, this being an impossibility (a desired one, on top of it) in
so far as i tis a hybrid music.
It happens that both violinist and key player don’t think about
music in terms of a finished product, be it a composition or a piece of
work. For them, the musical activity is more important than what results
therefrom. Blending the sounds each one of them creates into an indiscernible
amalgam, the purpose of which would lie in itself, doesn’t interest
them. More attractive is to get hold of their respective personalities
and seize the inner voice of both in order to try, based on the latter,
a mutual stimulation, a dialogue or, better still, a “creative dialectical
dynamics” to make use of their own words. Such being in fact the
route to improvisation given the understanding it implies of “the
other” (meaning either the public or the musician(s) with whom one
plays). After all, before playing the improviser listens. Better still:
he does it with the prioritary prospect of being listened to. Silences,
challenges and not necessarily foreseeable (the less the better!) reactions,
contrasts and complementarities, ostinatos, glissandos, embrionary structures,
bits of phrases never taking form, “self-intonations”, cascades
of notes, “drones”, only apparently non-musical noises (Cage,
always Cage), microtonalities, audio landscapes, false solos, inflexions
of discourse, breaking of linearity as soon as it becomes a menace, simple
murmurs or convultions, all this together becomes the working material
of a twosome music, freely shared and directed to the “systhematic
exploitation of the moment”, a music which elects real time both
as substrate and cause.
Let it not be believed, though, that by having chosen to individuate their
names on this CD’s cover Ernesto Rodrigues and Jorge Valente have
solved their dilemma. The music they play between themselves is rather
different from the one played by the former in contexts such as Lautari
Consort or IK*Zs, and by the latter while member of the group Trioto Flêumico
or Fromage Digital. There’s something which finally prevails over
their respective influences and wills, something of which the two of them
together rather than separately are simultaneously subject and object
– a “something” which belongs to the sphere of indetermination,
of chance. Improvisation is a music of accidents, and these not only do
give birth to events, they also change beings. What two (or three, or
six, or twenty...) musicians result in while playing together depends
on the circumstances and on the way they adapt to each other, not only
on what is most constant in them. Improvised music, an individualistic
cry of freedom (let’s face it: he who is partial to improvisation
will always be regarded as, to say at least, bizarre...), is also –
in a deliciously noteworthy paradox – the most gregarious of musics,
one that longs for collectiveness.
It is not surprising, in fact, that in the musical case histories of Ernesto
Rodrigues and Jorge Valente one comes upon popular if not actually traditional
music. Ernesto Rodrigues has played with Fausto and presently integrates
Jorge Palma’s band; Valente is an applied student of the music of
African Portuguese speaking countries, which he even produced and edited.
In spite of their devotion to a minority musical practice, they take an
interest in Portugal’s and Africa’s common patrimony including
it, though perhaps not consciously, in their improvisations. The way Ernesto
Rodrigues plays the violin bears testimony to this with its “folk”
dimension and crudeness which is the stamp of the popular violin anywhere
in the world. As to Jorge Valente... Isn’t it true that, nowadays,
the computer is the popular instrument by excellence?
Rui
Eduardo Paes
|